Changing economic and political background has rendered traditional manufacturing bases obsolete, demanding adaptive leadership. The old patronage systems that sustained established political parties face challenges as first time voters enter the electoral rolls. Survival in this evolving political climate requires adaptation, and those who fail to do so may face obsolescence. While the Pakistan Tahrik e Insaf disruptive political tactics pose a threat to national stability, Imran Khan’s enduring appeal among the populace reflects deeper socio-economic dynamics. The evolving political and economic landscape demands adaptive leadership and understanding the drivers of this connection is crucial for navigating Pakistan’s future challenges. Balancing political ambitions with the nation’s welfare remains the paramount challenge for the PTI and its leadership

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf appears to have reverted to a familiar tactic: economic blackmailing as a means of political leverage. This approach, especially when Pakistan finds itself at a critical juncture in its economic history, is not only politically questionable but also ethically indefensible. Barrister Ali Zafar, a PTI leader, announced that Prime Minister Imran Khan would be writing a letter to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), urging them to cease support for Pakistan due to alleged rigged elections. The PTI’s justification revolves around the notion that international organizations like the IMF and the European Union should only engage with countries exhibiting good governance. According to the PTI, seeking an IMF bailout without first conducting an audit of the election results would be detrimental to the nation. While reservations about the electoral process are acknowledged, attempting to halt crucial financial support by involving international bodies rather than pursuing legal avenues is a reckless move.

Disruptive strategy reflects a tendency within the PTI to prioritize its political agendas over the national interest. The party’s actions imply a willingness to sow chaos and promote anarchy if not in power. This is not the first instance of the PTI attempting to sabotage an IMF deal; leaked audio from August 2022 exposed the party’s former finance minister advising against compliance with the IMF deal, highlighting a pattern of behavior. The historical context reveals a recurring theme: the PTI’s inclination to disrupt stability when not in power. During the 2014 dharna, Imran Khan advocated civil disobedience and encouraged people to evade legal financial channels – all because the PTI was not in control. Such actions raise concerns about the party’s commitment to the nation’s welfare and the responsible exercise of political power.

In comparison, other political parties, even amidst allegations of electoral rigging, have refrained from jeopardizing vital agreements for the country’s economic stability. The PML-N, during Mian Nawaz Sharif’s incarceration, did not attempt to undermine the PTI government’s IMF deal. Instead, Shehbaz Sharif proposed a Charter of Economy for the collective benefit of the nation. The PTI’s willingness to jeopardize the nation’s financial stability for political gain is a dangerous precedent. The party needs to introspect and evaluate whether its pursuit of power justifies putting the entire country at risk of economic instability. This style of politics not only damages the PTI’s credibility but also poses a significant threat to Pakistan’s economic well-being.

Despite the PTI’s disruptive political maneuvers, it is undeniable that Imran Khan continues to enjoy substantial support from the populace. Predictions of his political downfall have repeatedly proven wrong, and his ability to connect with the masses remains a potent force. Imran Khan’s resilience is evident in his adept use of populist appeals to rally public support whenever faced with political challenges. The post-no-confidence long march in May 2022 and subsequent electoral victories in by-elections showcased Imran Khan’s ability to rejuvenate his political standing through direct engagement with the people. Even after facing hurdles such as incarceration and restrictions on political activities, Khan’s appeal resonated with voters, leading to significant electoral wins.

The recent elections in February 2024, marked by allegations of rigging and attempts to suppress the PTI’s appeal, further underscored Imran Khan’s enduring connection with the electorate. Theories abound regarding the drivers of this connection – anti-establishment sentiments, economic challenges, or aversion to other political figures. However, the undeniable truth is that Imran Khan has established a powerful and enduring bond with the people. To understand the roots of Imran Khan’s appeal, one must examine the evolving economic landscape and demographic changes in Pakistan. The country faces critical choices, including adapting to a high-energy-cost environment with imported LNG replacing dwindling domestic gas supplies. Additionally, a mounting debt burden necessitates a departure from traditional economic practices, emphasizing reliance on domestic resources rather than foreign borrowing.

Failure to navigate these transitions risks high inflation and unemployment, particularly as Pakistan absorbs a burgeoning youth population. The demographic shift, with over two million new entrants to the workforce annually, requires strategic economic policies to accommodate this youth bulge. Imran Khan’s appeal, rooted in populist rhetoric and connection with the masses, taps into the aspirations and frustrations of this young demographic.