News indicating the closure of 542 schools during the current government’s tenure raise alarm bells that cannot be ignored. This disconcerting trend reflects systemic failures and highlights the urgent need for comprehensive reforms to protect the educational prospects of the province’s youth. The reasons behind these school closures are complex and multifaceted. However, the consequences remain painfully clear. An entire generation of children is being deprived of the foundational skills necessary for progress. The continuous decline in functional schools not only stifles individual development but also jeopardizes the province’s overall advancement. In an educational system that is already fragile, the absence of concerned Members of the Provincial Assembly during critical question sessions on education only adds to the sense of neglect and urgency surrounding this issue.

The proposed amendments to the Indus River System Authority Act (IRSA) Act must be approached with caution. The voices calling for a consultative and inclusive process should not only be heard but actively engaged. Safeguarding provincial rights to water is not merely an administrative concern; it is an ethical imperative that underscores the need for unity in the face of shared challenges. As Sindh and Balochistan stand firm against perceived injustices, it is a reminder that the management of water is not just about allocation, but about justice, equity, and the sustainable future of all provinces in Pakistan.

The recent discussions surrounding the potential amendment of the retirement age for Supreme Court judges in Pakistan have stirred a debate that resonates deeply within the legal and political spheres. The government has indicated its intention to introduce legislation that could extend the retirement age from 65 to 68, a move that critics argue may complicate the balance of justice and governance in an already tumultuous judicial environment. Under the existing framework established by Article 179 of the Pakistani Constitution, a Supreme Court judge must retire upon reaching the age of 65. As the proposal for an extension takes shape, it is crucial to analyze its implications and whether it serves the interests of judicial integrity and independence or merely reinforces entrenched power dynamics.