. More recently, industrialist Arif Habib has also urged Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to engage with Imran Khan, who is currently detained in Adiala Jail. The media, too, has echoed these sentiments, urging all political factions to unite for the betterment of the nation. Opinions diverge regarding the prospect of engaging with the PTI within the PML-N. While one camp believes that initiating dialogue with the PTI could mitigate the country’s political tension, another faction views the PTI as a disruptive force that thrives on chaos.

Nevertheless, there is unanimity amongst politicians, businessmen, journalists, and political analysts that Imran Khan poses the primary obstacle to an amicable resolution through dialogue. The current state of Pakistan urgently necessitates healing and the cessation of political animosity. While it is true that the PTI is often associated with tumult, it remains an immensely popular party that cannot be dismissed outright. Engagement with the PTI is imperative for the sake of national unity. Despite the PTI’s history of reluctance, efforts towards dialogue should not be abandoned. Recent insinuations of a potential ‘deal’ between the PTI and the establishment have spurred speculations, swiftly dispelled by Imran Khan. Realistically, Imran Khan faces two viable options: engaging in dialogue with opposition parties or striking a deal with the establishment. Presently, both avenues appear closed. For meaningful dialogue to materialize, Imran himself must seize the opportunity for negotiations hinted at by President Zardari and explicitly offered by figures like Rana Sana and PPP leader Nadeem Chan.

Some critics posit that the PTI missed a chance to expand its political landscape by rejecting the PPP’s post-election offer to form a federal government on February 8. Imran Khan has consistently refrained from engaging with political adversaries, especially within the two major parties the PPP and the PML-N. Whether during his tenure as Prime Minister, following his ouster via a vote of no-confidence, or presently, Imran Khan has displayed an aversion towards dialogue. This reluctance underscores his disinclination towards utilizing democratic means to navigate the current impasse. Is it conceivable that Imran solely seeks to broker deals with what he perceives as the country’s true power structures?

The efficacy of such a strategy remains debatable. Some argue that while the establishment eventually strikes agreements with politicians, including those out of favor, Imran Khan’s case may diverge due to the events of May 9. In contrast, others posit scenarios where the PTI could capitalize: a dismal economic performance by the Shehbaz-led government, a rift between PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif and the authorities, or a shift in the current power dynamics. However, it is imperative to reiterate for all parties the pivotal significance of engaging in political discourse rather than relying on external directives. A unified dialogue among all political entities serves as the groundwork to gradually dismantle a system that undermines the essence of democracy.

Extending an olive branch signifies an unparalleled gesture of peace, reconciliation, and goodwill. The symbolism of the olive branch dates back centuries, rooted in ancient traditions and mythology where it represented harmony and unity. Olive branches have been offered in times of conflict to signal a desire for understanding and resolution. The significance of the olive branch lies in its ability to bridge divides, mend broken relationships, and foster a sense of unity among adversaries.

By extending an olive branch, individuals demonstrate a willingness to let go of animosity, embrace mutual respect, and work towards common goals. In a world marked by division and discord, the importance of the olive branch as a symbol of peace cannot be overstated. It serves as a powerful reminder of the transformative power of forgiveness, empathy, and the shared aspiration for a more peaceful and harmonious coexistence.